index | previous | next

Chapter 3
Funny science


TRUE, FALSE OR FUNNY? 
Getting your way with triple logic.
by Derek Brownlee

As published in ETC.: A Review of General Semantics, a quarterly published by the International Society for General Semantics Vol. 45, No. 2, Summer 1988. Copyright © 1988 by ISGS, republished by permission


 

"The truth is the one thing that nobody will believe." --George Bernard Shaw.

 

We used to think that two logic values, true and false, would take us and our computers anywhere. We weren't even close. In fact, differing points of view and lies presented as truth make true-false a four-value system that cannot be resolved by any scientific method.


         TRUE    FALSE             0       0      meaningless             0       1      lie             1       0      truth             1       1      paradox, dilemma and conflict.



To escape from the dilemmas of false truth we must introduce a third variable, humor, as suggested by William E. Hawk ("An Official Fool for the White House," Et cetera, Summer 1987). The third variable increases the possibilities to eight:


   TRUE  FALSE  FUNNY       0     0     0      Null reaction, meaningless.       0     0     1      Funny but meaningless, childish.       0     1     0      Serious lies, authoritarian.       0     1     1      Errors, jokes, the lie exposed.       1     0     0      Serious truth, belief, science.       1     0     1      True and funny, new truth, aha!       1     1     0      Paradox, dilemma and conflict.       1     1     1      Freedom from belief, hilarious ambiguity.



If we look at the three lines for true, false and funny by themselves we find the kind of personality that goes with each of these logic variables:


   TRUE  FALSE  FUNNY       0     0     1      Funny but meaningless        CHILD              0     1     0      Serious lies         AUTHORITARIAN      1     0     0      Serious truth, belief    SCIENTIST



This trio looks somewhat familiar. It forms a complete psychological system corresponding to the three components of the personality, per Freudian or Transactional Analysis:


   PARENT     superego     source of LIES    ADULT      ego          source of TRUTH    CHILD      id           source of FUN



For the archetypal Parent something is true "because I say it is." The Parental worldview is held together with emotion, much stronger than reason.

The third variable, humor, is more powerful yet. Mark Twain said humor was the most powerful force for change in the world. That is why the Parent, in the pure form of the army drill instructor, will not tolerate it. We cannot just expose the lie (false-funny). We have to be more devious and look to the last line of the true-false-funny table, which includes the rich territory of the hoax and the con.

Truth, Lies and Secrets

Information has value and is a commodity that can be produced, traded, and concealed from others. In the last case it is a secret. Making information scarce raises its value.

Misinformation can also be generated to confuse competitors and conceal secrets, and the games that can be played with true-false logic are both sophisticated and familiar. Espionage and double-agentry are staples of our entertainment and a serious occupational specialty in our world.

Introducing humor may be essential to sanity in a truthless environment. False and funny turns all the lies into jokes, making them easier to tolerate and harder to believe. But humor could be a problem when presenting one's own lies. Adding humor to a lie negates it. What's the jovial spy to do? Get serious all of a sudden? What a giveaway!

What if we add humor to a truth? Aha! Humor negates truth also. Humor makes truth look just like a false-funny joke. The recipient may actually believe what we're saying for a moment, but will never make that mistake again. Instead there is a great joke to pass along. This truth, by entering the culture as a joke and a lie, is both proliferated and protected. The information is kept secret by broadcasting it everywhere.


The Republic of Zwongo has announced its intention of annexing Wall Street on a certain date, as a promotional event for its cut-glass exports. Zwongan secret agents, poised to execute the coup, are coordinated through the daily schedule published in the newspapers and PR handouts. Film crews have been lined up for all the most sensitive operations. The filming demonstrates (1) that nothing is happening--it's only a movie and (2) that the coup really did happen--as everybody can see on the evening news. Triple logic reaches its full flower in having it both ways. 

Adding humor is how to get a truth past the Parent, and our contemporaries in authoritarian lands may have more experience in this art. The deception itself is funny to the perpetrators, who can laugh along with the victims but for a different reason. And telling the truth is the easiest story to produce. To camouflage it, just embed it in regular false-funny jokes.

How humorless and dull it would be to live in a land of total truth. Fortunately there is a natural mechanism to restore lies, especially among the devotees of ultimate truth:

Some people came and listened to him and understood, and left. Others came and listened and did not understand and stayed. --Alan Watts on Gurdjieff.

Unnatural behavior requires strong beliefs. Hence the strongest religions have been the least natural. --Edward De Bono, The Happiness Purpose,1977.

All of the true things I am about to tell you are shameless lies. Anyone unable to understand how a useful religion can be founded on lies will not understand this book either. --Kurt Vonnegut, Cat's Cradle, 1963.

Could it be that our fundamental beliefs rest on a foundation of error? More bluntly, are we all crazy? This dreadful possibility has been broached by a few brave souls such as Kurt Vonnegut and Joseph Heller. Heller's Catch-22 is a classic exploration of paradox and humor and sanity in the insane environment of war, with characters occupying every part of the triple logic diagram. But such questioning of our sanity can appear only as a joke, as a premise for a comic novel.

Entertainment

Humor has more entertainment value than truth or lies. It makes more money. The biggest money-maker is Bill Cosby, and Peanuts and Garfield are not far behind. Humor depends on the conflict of truth and lies for its material. The bigger the dilemma, the bigger the joke that can be made of it. Long live lies.

If humor exposes lies and sneaks truth in through the back door, it is to be welcomed as a tool to improve our knowledge, maybe even promote real change. But we know what the real importance of humor is: it makes us laugh.

Can triple logic improve on the comedy formulas now in use? That is the vital issue facing this baby twig on the tree of mathematics.

You think I jest? Let's look at the last paragraph. Is it true, false or funny?

The statement is true for those moved by sensation or profit. It is a false-funny joke to those of more intellectual bent, who can laugh at it and look for more serious applications: How can triple logic expand our thinking, improve our communication or cast light on our psychology? On the other hand, our culture selects new ideas with regard to their sensation and profit. Such considerations may indeed be vital to the success and longevity of any new concept.

The true-false-funny statement is an example of ambiguity, to be believed by one group and treated as a joke by another, thus alienating nobody. Here is the mainstream of triple logic, where we're not doing battle with lies, but are making use of differing viewpoints. The bigger the difference, the bigger the joke. There is freedom of belief: the joker does not have to persuade, and the target is free to take it either way.

"If you tell the truth, sooner or later you'll be found out."
-- Oscar Wilde.



The truth will set you free?

No, not even close. The truth will get you locked up or killed. Lies rule the world. Funny sets us free.

We add a third logic value. A new dimension of thought. Science has a poetic name for this: a new degree of freedom.

That's our way up and out. Follow funny to the next level of consciousness.

 

Mirror world

The 1988 paper on triple logic shows that funny doubles the number of logic states from four to eight. For each of the four serious states there is a funny counterpart. We can think of funny world as a mirror world. Serious world is our raw material and we make it funny.

Serious world is the basis historically for most of our humor and comic performances. Funny world will follow this tradition. We're grateful for all the material that serious world provides. We're not against serious world. We need it and nurture it. Without it we'd have nothing to mirror.

We don't judge serious world on whether it is true or false, right or wrong, good or bad. We care only about its humor potential.

A mirror world opens up an alternative reality, so we can escape from wherever we're stuck in the true-false world, and try something different.

 

When a thing is funny, search it carefully for a hidden truth.
-- George Bernard Shaw
 

Third logical dimension

While we can think of mirror world as a doubling of possibility, a third dimension offers an unlimited increase. The true-false world is flatland. We can rise in the third dimension. We can fly.

Mirror world stays close to the surface, playing off serious world. Most of our humor is just jumping off the surface a little way and falling back to earth.

The extra dimension offers a much more spacious prospect. How high can our funny imagination take us? There are endless funny worlds to explore.

The third dimension also gives us mobility to escape the traps and dead ends of serious world, to move in ways that seem miraculous to flatlanders. Stories of superheroes and advanced aliens and humans from the future may give us some hints of our funny powers.

With a third dimension to play in, funny science is a promising new field to develop. The first thought of flatlanders is, how can I use this to make serious money or improve serious world?

That view is shortsighted. Funny science works in the third dimension of funny world, and should improve funny world. The greatest benefits in serious world are gained by making it funny, and not by enhancing its seriousness. As far as serious world is concerned, funny science is a joke, which is of course its highest function.

 

"The human race has one really effective weapon, and that is laughter." -- Mark Twain

Flying in the third dimension

True-false logic is two-dimensional. Funny adds a third dimension. Now we can fly. But only as long as we're flapping our wings. We must be funny. We have to keep it up. The moment we stop being funny, we crash back to earth, to flatland, serious again.
 


Laughter overrules lies

The fool does not get drawn into the battleground of truth and lies. But what else is there? Our heretics must move in a third dimension to escape the anvil of right and wrong. They move in the direction of FUN, and never mind if something's true or false--is it funny? Laughter overrules lies without a fight.

 

 Jokes activate same brain region as cocaine
Nature News Service


Quantum thought

Ever since Schroedinger half-sacrificed a cat in a brutal thought experiment, we have understood that the quantum world is at base uncertain, a coexistence of true and false, which is sometimes resolved by observation.

Jokes depend on ambiguity. Is this story true or false? Does it lead to A or B? Not until the punch line do the elements fall into place.

Ambiguity itself is a joke. Is this a hoax or for real? If the uncertainty is never resolved, we have a running joke in the coexistence of the two opinions.

Quantum physics and funny thinking seem to be following the same principles. Could the universe be a cosmic joke?

 

 There are three things which are real: God, human folly, and laughter. The first two are beyond our comprehension. So we must do what we can with the third.
-- John F. Kennedy


Why funny?

Funny adds a third logical dimension to true and false. In "True, False or Funny?" it's shown how funny works compatibly with true and false. We don't know of any other logical value that could work. Funny is therefore the only way to ascend, and escape from the true-false flatland prison.

This makes must be funny the one true faith. Only by becoming funny are we saved.
 
 

index | previous | next